The College of Law’s Legal Services Policy Institute has proposed a somewhat interesting take on qualifying to be a Solicitor.

The proposal states that once a student completes the LPC they are a qualified solicitor. However the only work they will be able to do is ‘unreserved legal activities such as transactional work or employment advice.’ Basically a glorified paralegal role. If a ‘qualified solicitor’ would then want rights of audience then they would have to complete further training at a law firm similar to that of the current training contract.

Although this sounds good on paper, it would then make it much more easier to become a qualified solicitor, yet you wouldn’t quite be a full qualified solicitor, as you would have no rights of audience. The profession would then be not as somewhat special as it is now. Would this mean that any tom, dick and harry would then qualify once they pass the LPC?

Don’t get me wrong as I really wish the process in qualifying as a solicitor was a lot easier but I would rather be a fully qualified solicitor, not just one that can do the paperwork. I mean I do the paperwork now! It would also possibly mean that the older generation will be the one’s attending court as the younger generation wouldn’t have a clue unless they did the further training. But on the other hand so many people like myself could be qualified in an instant!

Another thing is that would this mean the end of paralegals and legal executives? They are somewhat similar roles to the proposed changes.

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see how far this goes!!

Found here!

Written in association with no win no fee lawyers

I came across this on the Gazette website FINALLY to somewhat confirm what has happened.

On 8 July 2009, the panel of adjudicators sub-committee resolved to intervene in the practice of John David Cort who ­formerly practised at Blackbird House, 57A Blackbird Road, Leicester LE4 0AR under the firm name Corts.The reason for the intervention was that the panel was satisfied that there was reason to suspect ­dishonesty on the part of Mr Cort; that Mr Cort has failed to comply with the Solicitors Accounts Rules 1998; that Mr Cort has been remanded in custody; and that it is necessary to intervene to protect the interests of clients (or ­former or potential clients) of Mr Cort or his firm, or the interests of the ­beneficiaries of any trust of which Mr Cort is or was a trustee. Marion Vesey of Shacklocks, St Peter’s House, Bridge Street, Mansfield NG18 1AL, tel: 01623 626141, DX: 10352 Mansfield, has been appointed to act as the authority’s agent and she attended at the office of Corts and took ­possession of practice papers on 9 July 2009. Pursuant to the intervention ­resolution, the practising certificate of Mr Cort has been suspended with immediate effect.

Still no word on the pending court case though.