Found this in the news section over at lawcareers.net

The Law Society has warned employers against using social networking sites such as Facebook and Myspace to vet job candidates, because doing so could lead to discrimination claims. The advice was issued as part of the society’s nationwide information campaign “Help, I need somebody”, which encouraged consumers to seek legal advice from a solicitor when necessary. The Employment Practices Data Protection Code allows vetting where there is a significant risk involved to the employer, clients, customers or others; but employers should not rely on information gleaned from the sites, as it could be unreliable.

Law Society Employment Law Committee chair John Morris said: “Using these sites to canvass more information about an employee or an interview candidate is potentially risky for an employer. For example, it is possible to obtain information about a person’s sexual orientation or religious beliefs that can impact or is perceived to impact on the decision made to recruit or not recruit that person – this can lead to discrimination claims.”

The society also warned employees of the risk of befriending employers on social networking sites and urged people to use the privacy settings available.

Interesting how the Law Society have actually condemned using Facebook. I always thought it would be good to find out about a person through social networking sites before employing them. However the down side to this is that certain private information will be available and may be used against you say at interview.

For those who still opt into having a fully open and viewable profile; don’t do it! It is best to keep your profile private, for more than one reason. It would however be interesting to see how a discrimination claim would be brought if based solely on social networking sites where you can remove certain information in an instant.

Meet Amitjo Kajla, 22, who was sacked from her job as a prison guard at a prison in Wolverhampton. She was told that she wore too tight clothes, had make up on and was too ‘weak’ looking. She was discriminated against her looks as well as her age and sex.

If she was not the young, attractive woman that she is, he [fellow prison officer Lee Hastings] would not have treated her in the way he did.  He engaged in unwanted conduct that had the purpose or effect of violating her dignity or of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for her.  A bully chooses as his victim someone he perceives to be vulnerable- in this case a slightly built young female.

Thankfully she won her case and will find out the compensation she will receive in November. Shame on you prison for doing such a thing! Surely there should be one for people who look a right mess, maybe not!!